The Road Ahead

by

Recent Articles

Rusher at 100: Realism for the 21st Century

(June 23, 2023—revised December 21, 2023) William Rusher, a dynamic force on the American right who passed away in 2011 after decades as comrade and mentor to many conservatives, was born a full century ago on July 19, 1923. His centenary comes at a hard time for...

Book Presentation: “If Not Us, Who?” by David B. Frisk

Click to watch the presentation of "If Not Us, Who?" by David Frisk to the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC on C-SPAN. David Frisk's book, If Not Us, Who?: William Rusher, 'National Review,' and the Conservative Movement, offers a comprehensive exploration of the...

Bill’s Biography

William Rusher was an influential political strategist, commentator, and debater at the heart of the conservative movement in the second half of the twentieth century, a movement whose ascent he documented in his 1984 book The Rise of the Right -- one of many examples...

More Resources

“If Not Us, Who?”

If Not Us, Who? takes you on a journey into the life of William Rusher, a key player in shaping the modern conservative movement. Known for his long stint as the publisher of National Review, Rusher wasn't just a publisher—he was a crucial strategist and thinker in...

This column is being written in advance of the elections on Tuesday, but there is no serious doubt among observers that the Democrats will win — increasing their margins in both Houses of Congress, and among the governorships as well, and capturing the presidency. Any other result would be an earthshaking development, but nobody is holding their breath.

But the additions to the Democratic margins in the House and Senate are not likely to alter the balance of forces in either body. Even if they succeed in increasing their margin in the Senate to 60, which is unlikely, that body will remain resistant to total Democratic control. A 60-vote majority would make it theoretically possible for the Democrats to keep Senate Republicans from blocking measures they desire (since it could prevent filibusters), but in any group of 60 politicians there are almost always bound to be one or two who will go off the reservation at any key moment. The same is true of the Republicans, of course: if they have only 41, there is always the danger that one will defect and give the Democrats that critical 60th vote. But the point remains: irresistible Democratic control of the Senate will remain unlikely at best.

The House of Representatives is, of course, another matter. The Democrats already have a fairly comfortable majority there, however, and increasing it a bit will simply nail down their dominance.

Far more consequential will be the election of a Democratic president, to replace George W. Bush. President Obama will be the nation’s undisputed leader, with vast appointive powers to enforce his will. And the new Congress will, of course, be eager to follow his lead, especially in the early going. With three Supreme Court seats likely to become vacant in the near future, that immensely influential body also seems likely to fall under total Democratic sway.

Where this sea change in the nation’s political control will take us remains to be seen. In the Senate, Obama has tended to go along with the Democratic majority — which is to say, to vote along liberal lines. But if he has had any impulse to kick over the traces and sponsor far-left legislation, he has concealed it well. And during the campaign he stayed generally short of the sort of redistributionist rhetoric associated with the left, though one or two other Democratic spokesmen allowed themselves to sound tempted by it.

Above all, this year’s Democratic campaign stayed well short of proclaiming a far-left agenda. The party seemed to sense that this was its year, and it was broadly content to let that fact produce the indicated victory, without making any bloodthirsty claims about how it would reorganize the basic dynamics of American politics if it was elected. To reveal deeply leftist intentions now would betray these implicit assurances to the American people.

As for the Republicans, without the presidency or control of either house of Congress, they will be confined to the resources available to a Congressional minority: to object, to propose amendments (which will usually fail), and to hope for a better day. They need not feel that they somehow disgraced themselves when they were in power, and were ousted accordingly. Rather, they simply fell prey to the voters’ tendency to replace the ins with the outs every now and then. They had been in control of the presidency for eight years, and people just felt it was “time for a change.”

As a matter of fact, this may prove to be a particularly fruitful “seed time” for the GOP. Who are the fresh and attractive faces among the Republican governors? And who, in the House and Senate, will emerge as the party’s new leaders? Already certain young members of the House are making their mark. Among them, or among the senators, may be one (or more) capable of leading the Republican party to surprising new victories in the not too distant future.

*****

This article originally appeared on Townhall.com on Nov 04, 2008

Author

  • William Rusher

    William A. Rusher, a Distinguished Fellow of the Claremont Institute, was the publisher of National Review magazine from 1957 to 1988. A prominent conservative spokesman, Rusher gained national recognition over forty years as a television and radio personality. Since 1973, his syndicated column "The Conservative Advocate" has appeared in newspapers across the U.S. He is also a prolific author and lecturer, with five books and numerous articles. His notable works include "The Making of the New Majority Party" and "The Rise of the Right." An influential political activist, Rusher was instrumental in the 1961 draft of Barry Goldwater for the 1964 Republican nomination, which reshaped the Republican Party and continued under Ronald Reagan. He graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School, served in the Air Force during World War II, and worked at a major Wall Street law firm. He also served as associate counsel to the U.S. Senate's Internal Security Subcommittee before joining National Review. In 1989, Rusher became a Distinguished Fellow at the Claremont Institute, continuing to write and advise from his home in San Francisco. He remains active on various boards, including the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs, National Review Inc., and the Media Research Center.

    View all posts