Series: The Advocates
Episode: 78
Original Link: https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-xd0qr4p434
Video Embed:
Episode Summary:
This episode of The Advocates centered on the question: Should television news be exempt from the fairness doctrine? Advocate Howard Miller and his witnesses argued that the fairness doctrine, which requires broadcasters to present contrasting views on controversial issues, amounts to government censorship that chills journalistic freedom and inhibits robust investigative reporting on television. Comparing it unfavorably to the freedoms enjoyed by newspapers, the pro-exemption side argued that real marketplace competition among ideas—rather than government oversight—is the best remedy for bias, and warned that government regulation of content, even for broadcast news, endangers fundamental First Amendment principles.
Opposing this view, advocate William Rusher and his witnesses defended the fairness doctrine as a necessary safeguard against the concentration of media power, given the limited number of television channels and the dominance of three major networks. They presented evidence (notably Edith Efron’s content analysis of network election coverage) that network broadcast news contains substantial political bias—primarily from liberal perspectives—and argued that without the fairness doctrine, viewers would lack access to diverse viewpoints. The fairness doctrine, they contended, is not censorship but a simple requirement that, if bias exists, opposing views be given a hearing; it is justified as long as television broadcasting remains an effective monopoly.
The debate highlighted deep tensions about media power, the nature of bias, and the balance between freedom of expression and government intervention to ensure pluralism. Ultimately, the episode framed a larger question: whether the solution to media bias is more government oversight to guarantee fairness, or less—trusting in open competition and the public’s ability to discern among competing viewpoints without official interference.