The Advocates – Video: Should large corporations be driven out of farming?

by

Series: The Advocates

Episode: 98

Original Link: https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-6w96688q7b

Video Embed:

Episode Summary:

This episode of The Advocates addressed the question of whether large corporations should be driven out of farming, focusing on the impact of corporate involvement on small family farms and rural America. Advocate Howard Miller, joined by Jim Hightower and Senator Fred Harris, argued that the increasing presence of industrial conglomerates in agriculture displaces family farmers who are often more efficient, but cannot compete with the financial advantages, tax write-offs, and market power of large corporations. They contended that beyond economic metrics, the decline of the family farm brings significant human and social costs—eroding rural communities, local economies, and ultimately fueling urban problems as displaced farmers flock to cities. Miller’s side supported legislation (the Family Farm Act) that would force companies with substantial non-farm assets to divest their agricultural holdings, in an effort to restore real competition and revitalize rural America.

Opposing this view, William Rusher and his witnesses—direct farmers, agribusiness executives, and an agricultural economist—argued that large corporations are not the cause of small farm decline, but rather partners that provide vital capital, marketing, and technological support to many independent growers. They maintained that modern agriculture requires scale and efficiency, and that restrictions on corporate ownership would create chaos, harm productive partnerships, drive up food prices, and do little to help the smallest struggling farms. Instead, they asserted, much of the industry’s transformation is driven by technological change and market forces unrelated to corporate power.

The episode crystallized deeper tensions between economic efficiency and social values, modernization and tradition, and the appropriate role of government intervention in market structure. While Miller’s team emphasized preserving the fabric of rural society and ensuring a level playing field, Rusher’s side warned against protectionism that could undermine competitiveness and ultimately harm both consumers and farmers.

Author

  • The William A. Rusher Centennial Project aims to produce substantive intellectual media that, rooted in Mr. Rusher’s work, pushes today’s conservative movement to adopt a more coherent philosophy, a stronger coalition, and a more effective set of political and legal strategies. In short, the Project aims, as Mr. Rusher aimed, to get more votes for conservatism. And in so doing, it aims to inspire respect and enthusiasm the way Mr. Rusher did, while fighting effectively, confidently, and cheerfully for the conservative views he articulated. Those views, rooted in Locke and Burke, and founded in the Declaration of Independence, are not necessarily those views often misidentified today as “conservative.” The Project seeks to advance and to adapt Mr. Rusher’s views -- in line with his legacy -- so that they have broad resonance and appeal in the current political environment.

    View all posts

Recent Articles

Quotes About William Rusher

“Nobody, but nobody, was more at the heart of this. Rusher’s fingerprints were everywhere—and not just involved, but you get a feeling that he was pulling an awful lot of the strings.” — Richard Viguerie, referring to Rusher’s role in the conservative movement over...

The Quotable Bill Rusher Part 2: From His Books

Special Counsel (1968) “… a steady diet of political infighting tends to coarsen, and ultimately to cheapen, most participants. They approach politics as reasonably honorable citizens, and by imperceptible degrees it sucks them into its vortex. The plainly right...

The Quotable Bill Rusher

from If Not Us, Who? William Rusher, National Review, and the Conservative Movement “Politicians are the grease on which society’s wheels turn. And they can’t be better, most of the time, than a sort of low competence and honor.”—from an interview for Rusher’s...

Rusher at 100: Realism for the 21st Century

(June 23, 2023—revised December 21, 2023) William Rusher, a dynamic force on the American right who passed away in 2011 after decades as comrade and mentor to many conservatives, was born a full century ago on July 19, 1923. His centenary comes at a hard time for...

Book Presentation: “If Not Us, Who?” by David B. Frisk

Click to watch the presentation of "If Not Us, Who?" by David Frisk to the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC on C-SPAN. David Frisk's book, If Not Us, Who?: William Rusher, 'National Review,' and the Conservative Movement, offers a comprehensive exploration of the...

Bill’s Biography

William Rusher was an influential political strategist, commentator, and debater at the heart of the conservative movement in the second half of the twentieth century, a movement whose ascent he documented in his 1984 book The Rise of the Right -- one of many examples...

More Resources

Quotes About William Rusher

“Nobody, but nobody, was more at the heart of this. Rusher’s fingerprints were everywhere—and not just involved, but you get a feeling that he was pulling an awful lot of the strings.” — Richard Viguerie, referring to Rusher’s role in the conservative movement over...

The Quotable Bill Rusher Part 2: From His Books

Special Counsel (1968) “… a steady diet of political infighting tends to coarsen, and ultimately to cheapen, most participants. They approach politics as reasonably honorable citizens, and by imperceptible degrees it sucks them into its vortex. The plainly right...

The Quotable Bill Rusher

from If Not Us, Who? William Rusher, National Review, and the Conservative Movement “Politicians are the grease on which society’s wheels turn. And they can’t be better, most of the time, than a sort of low competence and honor.”—from an interview for Rusher’s...

“If Not Us, Who?”

If Not Us, Who? takes you on a journey into the life of William Rusher, a key player in shaping the modern conservative movement. Known for his long stint as the publisher of National Review, Rusher wasn't just a publisher—he was a crucial strategist and thinker in...

Contact Us