Bush’s Last Few Months


Recent Articles

Rusher at 100: Realism for the 21st Century

(June 23, 2023—revised December 21, 2023) William Rusher, a dynamic force on the American right who passed away in 2011 after decades as comrade and mentor to many conservatives, was born a full century ago on July 19, 1923. His centenary comes at a hard time for...

Book Presentation: “If Not Us, Who?” by David B. Frisk

Click to watch the presentation of "If Not Us, Who?" by David Frisk to the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC on C-SPAN. David Frisk's book, If Not Us, Who?: William Rusher, 'National Review,' and the Conservative Movement, offers a comprehensive exploration of the...

Bill’s Biography

William Rusher was an influential political strategist, commentator, and debater at the heart of the conservative movement in the second half of the twentieth century, a movement whose ascent he documented in his 1984 book The Rise of the Right -- one of many examples...

More Resources

“If Not Us, Who?”

If Not Us, Who? takes you on a journey into the life of William Rusher, a key player in shaping the modern conservative movement. Known for his long stint as the publisher of National Review, Rusher wasn't just a publisher—he was a crucial strategist and thinker in...

President Bush now has fewer than six months to serve, and the question arises as to what he ought to do with this remaining time.

There are important limitations on a president’s powers in the last few months of his administration. He can continue to make appointments to various federal offices, of course, but most of them will expire when his presidency does. The others — notably federal judgeships — usually require the approval of the Senate, and when (as is currently the case) the Senate is controlled by the other party, it will often prefer to refuse to act on the president’s nominations, simply leaving those offices vacant until they can be filled by the next president (who, of course, may be a member of their party).

The president can also continue to press for legislation that he favors (as Bush is currently doing in urging repeal of the congressional limits on offshore oil drilling), but here again, Congress may simply ignore him. The president’s clout — his power, for example, to do favors for individual congressmen and congresswomen — is shrinking day by day, and his influence over public opinion will almost certainly be diminishing, as well.

Even his influence over other countries is lessening. Whether their leaders sympathize with him or not, they are acutely aware that he will be gone forever in a matter of months, and that his successor may or may not be inclined to follow his policies in foreign affairs. They will, therefore, be tempted to postpone their own decisions until they know what the new president is likely to want.

So his last months in office are rarely very happy ones for a president, and Bush is no exception to the rule. Even so, it would be dangerous to dismiss him as irrelevant. He still has his “bully pulpit,” and the public has had nearly eight years of training in paying attention to what he says. The very fact that he has only a few months of power left may actually work in his favor in some respects, since people may be inclined to assume that, at this stage of the game, he will be less tempted to play partisan politics and more disposed to do various things “for the good of the country.”

So what should Bush do? He should certainly continue to call for permitting offshore oil drilling, since polls indicate that a majority of the public agrees with him, and the Democrats may be understandably reluctant to buck that combination. And in foreign affairs, he can take advantage of the friendships he has built with many of the major foreign leaders — Angela Merkel in Germany, Nicholas Sarkozy in France and Gordon Brown in England, to name only three — to craft international initiatives that will long outlast his own administration.

Beyond these and a few similar measures, however, Bush’s last few months in office are not likely to blossom with fruitful developments. Even if the Democrats who control Congress strongly favor various policies that Bush would like to implement, they will, humanly enough, be tempted to postpone implementing them until the next president (especially if he or she is a Democrat) can take the credit.

But, if I were Bush, I wouldn’t despair. He has not escaped being labeled by some people, as most presidents are before their terms are over, as “the worst president we have ever had.” But that is simply the bellow of exasperation vented by the worst critics of almost every president. I don’t detect, in the larger tides of public opinion, anything like that sort of animosity toward George W. Bush. He has plenty of critics, of course, but there isn’t a trace of savagery that animated the opponents of (say) Franklin Roosevelt and Richard Nixon. Bush may not go down in history as a great president, but neither will he be remembered as a terrible one.


This article originally appeared on Townhall.com on Aug 05, 2008


  • William Rusher

    William A. Rusher, a Distinguished Fellow of the Claremont Institute, was the publisher of National Review magazine from 1957 to 1988. A prominent conservative spokesman, Rusher gained national recognition over forty years as a television and radio personality. Since 1973, his syndicated column "The Conservative Advocate" has appeared in newspapers across the U.S. He is also a prolific author and lecturer, with five books and numerous articles. His notable works include "The Making of the New Majority Party" and "The Rise of the Right." An influential political activist, Rusher was instrumental in the 1961 draft of Barry Goldwater for the 1964 Republican nomination, which reshaped the Republican Party and continued under Ronald Reagan. He graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School, served in the Air Force during World War II, and worked at a major Wall Street law firm. He also served as associate counsel to the U.S. Senate's Internal Security Subcommittee before joining National Review. In 1989, Rusher became a Distinguished Fellow at the Claremont Institute, continuing to write and advise from his home in San Francisco. He remains active on various boards, including the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs, National Review Inc., and the Media Research Center.

    View all posts