The Advocates – Video: Should the Government Adopt Long-Term Wage and Price Controls for Selected Unions and Industries?

by | Videos

Series: The Advocates

Episode: 52

Original Link: https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-3t9d50fz8j

Episode Summary:

On this episode of The Advocates, the panel debated whether the Federal government should adopt long-term wage and price controls for selected unions and industries in response to persistent inflation. Howard Miller, joined by economist John Kenneth Galbraith and Congressman Henry Reuss, argued in favor, attributing ongoing inflation and rising unemployment to the “wage-price spiral” driven by powerful unions and concentrated corporate sectors. They proposed an immediate six-month freeze on all wages and prices, followed by permanent controls in industries with significant market power, suggesting this approach would break inflationary expectations and restore stability, citing prior successes from World War II and clarifying that only a targeted subset of the economy would face ongoing controls.

Opposing this view, William Rusher, with economist Milton Friedman and commentator William F. Buckley, Jr., argued that inflation fundamentally stems from excessive money supply growth, not wage and price bargaining. They warned that controls have failed historically, inevitably result in shortages, lower quality, black markets, and administrative complexity, and distract from the real solution: reducing government deficits and restraining monetary expansion. The episode encapsulated a deep divide—between interventionist policies designed for immediate relief and a monetary, market-oriented philosophy emphasizing patience and long-term economic fundamentals.

Author

  • The William A. Rusher Centennial Project aims to produce substantive intellectual media that, rooted in Mr. Rusher’s work, pushes today’s conservative movement to adopt a more coherent philosophy, a stronger coalition, and a more effective set of political and legal strategies.

    In short, the Project aims, as Mr. Rusher aimed, to get more votes for conservatism. And in so doing, it aims to inspire respect and enthusiasm the way Mr. Rusher did, while fighting effectively, confidently, and cheerfully for the conservative views he articulated. Those views, rooted in Locke and Burke, and founded in the Declaration of Independence, are not necessarily those views often misidentified today as “conservative.” The Project seeks to advance and to adapt Mr. Rusher’s views -- in line with his legacy -- so that they have broad resonance and appeal in the current political environment.

    View all posts

Recent Articles

Justice Clarence Thomas Reflects on Progressivism, April 15, 2026

Clarence Thomas — full remarks on progressivism, its foundations, history, and impact from his appearance at University of Texas at Austin: “Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, and Mao were all intertwined with the rise of progressivism, and all were opposed to the natural...

Rusher’s Wise, Vital Voice at National Review

“Bill Rusher is every bit as vital to National Review as I am,” William F. Buckley informed the audience at the magazine’s 20th anniversary dinner in 1975. “Tonight he has been trenchant, which he always is; and diplomatic, which usually he isn’t. In contrast to his...

Conservatism v. Progressivism

Who We Are: What is Conservatism? Conservatives in America seek to conserve the political inheritance of our Founders. That inheritance is a system of governance premised on the unchanging nature and God-given sovereignty, equality,...

A Model of Political Effectiveness: How Rusher Did It

William Rusher strengthened the conservative movement as an energizing leader, a formidable debater, an incisive columnist, and an engaged mentor who made things happen.  His success in these multiple roles makes his career a rich lesson in political...

Quotes on Progressivism: Definitions and Distinctions

Gathered and prepared by David Frisk “What, then, is progressivism? … we can think of it as an argument to progress, or to move beyond, the political principles of the American founding. It is an argument to enlarge vastly the scope of national government for the...

The Quotable Bill Rusher Part 2: From His Books

Special Counsel (1968) “… a steady diet of political infighting tends to coarsen, and ultimately to cheapen, most participants. They approach politics as reasonably honorable citizens, and by imperceptible degrees it sucks them into its vortex. The plainly right...